|
[SSSP home]
Introduction to relative rate of spoilage (RRS)
models
For fresh seafood, the relative rate of spoilage (RRS) at t°C has been defined as
the shelf-life at 0°C divided by the shelf-life at t°C (See Dalgaard 2002).
Thus, 0°C is used as a reference temperature for fresh fish but it can be
appropriate to use different reference temperatures e.g. 5°C for lightly
preserved seafoods. Mathematical RRS models are developed on the basis of
shelf-life data obtained at different storage temperatures in
experiments where shelf-life was determined by sensory evaluation. These models do not take
into account the types of reactions that cause spoilage at different
temperatures and this is an advantage in the sense that RRS models can be
valid for a wide range of storage temperatures. RRS-models are very simple but still most useful for
calculation of shelf-life at
different storage temperatures. To predict shelf-life at different
temperatures the user only needs to provide
the product shelf-life for a single known and constant storage temperature. The RRS models
then allow shelf-life to be predicted at different temperatures.
Early studies with fresh fish from temperate waters have shown the effect
of different combinations of the time and temperature on shelf-life to be additive (Charm et al.,
1972; McMeekin et al., 1988). More recently, this was confirmed with vacuum-packed
cold-smoked salmon (Dalgaard et al. 2004) and SSSP uses the concept of additive
effects when time-temperature integration relying on RRS-models is carried
out.
The effect of temperature on RRS differs markedly between groups
of seafoods as shown in Fig. 1. Consequently, different RRS-models are required
to evaluate the effect of temperature during storage of various seafoods.
Therefore, SSSP includes models for (i) fresh seafoods, (ii)
lightly preserved seafoods and (iii) models with user defined-parameter values
that can be applied for any type of food.
|
|

|
|
Figure 1. Effect of temperature
on the relative rates of spoilage for different types of seafoods. Modified from
Dalgaard (2003) with permission from Elsevier Ltd.
|
|
Types
of RRS-models
SSSP
includes the Exponential spoilage model with the temperature characteristic
'a' (Eqn. 1), the Arrhenius spoilage model with the temperature characteristic
'Ea' also called the apparent activation energy (Eqn. 2) and the
square-root spoilage model with the temperature characteristic 'Tmin'
(Eqn. 3). When RRS models are developed, rates
of spoilage (RS, days-1) can be calculated as the reciprocal of the
shelf-life determined by sensory evaluation. Log-transformed RS-data then can be
fitted to the exponential spoilage model (Eqn. 1a) and to the the Arrhenius
model (Eqn. 2a) whereas square-root transformed RS data are fitted to the square-root
spoilage model (Eqn. 3a).
|
|

|
| In Eqn. 1, 2 and 3 T
is temperature in °C, K is
temperature in Kelvin, R is the gas
constant 8.31 (J mol-1 K-1), k1, k2.
and k3 are constants. a,
Ea and Tmin
are the temperature characteristics in the three models, respectively. After
estimation of temperature characteristics with eqn. 1a, 2a and 3a shelf-life can
be predicted at different temperatures using Eqn. 1b, 2b and 3b. |
|

|
|
RRS models are developed on the basis of shelf-life data obtained directly from storage
trials with naturally contaminated seafoods. Consequently, validation of RRS-models is
different from product validation of microbial spoilage models developed from growth of specific microorganisms in laboratory media (See
MS
models). Validation of RRS-models consist in determining whether existing RRS-models are appropriate for
a given set of shelf-life data (or if a new model needs to be developed). To compare
observed and predicted RRS data, SSSP uses the accuracy
factor (eqn. 4) and graphical comparison of data (See Using SSSP under Comparison of observed and predicted RRS
data )
|
|